a post recycled

A Recapitulation 

A vision in the Apocalypse that is repeated.  A theory developed by Victorinus that is necessary to understand what John wrote.  It means chapters in the Apocalypse can’t be considered to be in chronological order.  That only leads to misinterpretation and a great deal of confusion.   

Home

a canon 

A Sacred Bible 

A list of books that might not contain the Apocalypse at the end of the fourth century.  John Chrysostom, who never quoted the Apocalypse, was in Ephesus at the beginning of the fifth century and Jerome was finishing his Vulgate.  Was Chrysostom able to confirm that the Apocalypse was written by the Apostle?  

Home 30

a prophecy

A Revelation of Jesus Christ 

A number to connect it with history.  You can trust numbers.  Not interpretation.  Not even the translators who somehow get the numbers right.  Historians do have trouble with dates but eventually they get it right.  The fulfillment of prophecy can only be confirmed with numbers.  

Home

a history 

A Witness 

A Church History that includes six of the seven churches that John wrote to but Eusebius never associates them with the Apocalypse.  Victorinus doesn’t even mention them.  Is it possible there is a version of the Apocalypse that doesn’t include the seven churches?  It could be a reasonable explanation for what we are looking at.  

Home  26

a commentary 

A Witness 

A view of what was.  We don’t know what the Apocalypse looked like in the third century.  Victorinus knew and we know what his commentary looked like.  It didn’t include the seven churches John wrote to.  It did include the seven churches Paul wrote to.  There is a reasonable explanation for this.  

Home 25