Saladin 

A Little Horn 

in Daniel.  Another fit with history that can’t be denied.  Not proof but a fit.  A better fit, if found, should be presented.  Both John (the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings) and Daniel (the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings) tell us horns are kings.  A dynasty has kings and Islam had ten dynasties named by Islam.  Saladinbefore whom there were three of the first horns, came out of the fourth dynasty and started the fifth.  A fit with numbers.  

Home 19

history 

A Necessary Ingredient 

along with numbers can help us interpret the Apocalypse.  Only history can confirm the fulfillment of prophecy.  Only numbers can prevent us from misinterpreting prophecy.  We can’t be sure what a ‘horn’ is but we can be sure there are ‘ten’ of them.  We can also be sure that the “ten horns” of Daniel are the same “ten horns” of the Apocalypse.  They have to fit history.  

Home 5

Daniel 

A Connection 

to the Apocalypse with the “ten horns” of the beast but to identify this beast, it must fit with the other parts of both Daniel and the Apocalypse.  Start with the Dome of the Rock which can be considered the abomination of desolation in that it is preventing the third Temple.  It was built by the King of the North, Muawiyah, who can easily be connected with the King of the South, Mohammed, and his daughter, Fatimah. – Daniel 11:6  – 

Home 4

numbers are 

A Key 

to understanding the Apocalypse.  No interpretation required.  Only history can fulfill prophecy and numbers are the only way to get historical events to fit with what has been prophesied.  All the numbers, not just a few, must fit a historical scenario. 

Home 24

ten horns 

A Connection With Daniel 

that will improve our understanding of the Apocalypse.  A bible search for “ten horns” ties the fourth beast of Daniel to the second beast of John.  Beasts are a significant part of both Daniel and the Apocalypse so Daniel is the place to go to understand what makes a beast a beast.  

Home 21

three johns 

A Strange Beginning 

in the Apocalypse.  Why is John mentioned three times?  Has anyone addressed this in a reasonable way?  Could they actually be three different people all named John?  Victorinus and Eusebius gives us reason to believe that.  Victorinus in his commentary doesn’t mention Antipas or the seven churches.  He does mention the seven churches Paul wrote to.  Eusebius doesn’t mention Antipas.  He does mention six of the seven churches but doesn’t associate them with the Apocalypse. Both may be looking at the first version written by John the Baptist. 

Home 14