A Little Book
that John ate and was told to prophesy again. These passages alone strongly suggest there were at least two versions of the Apocalypse. There are other reasons to believe this. You just have to look for them. It will improve your understanding as to why and when it was written along with who it was written by. Many didn’t think it belonged in the bible but somehow it made it.
Home 6
A Folly
according to Newton. What is your interpretation based on? The bible? Which translation? There are 59 different English translations plus revisions. They don’t agree. The differences are significant. Many are uncomfortable with the word interpretation because somehow they understand the original intent of the written word. Who or what can you believe?
A Thousand Years
but it happens just like Constantinople is missed. It’s a mystery that can be found no more at all. Preconceived interpretations have led to major errors. The biggest is the “reign of Christ” which cannot be found in the bible. Still many look for the return of Christ before looking for a thousand years. More can’t look past Rome to Constantinople which is a better fit for Babylon the Great.
Home 5
A Number
or I should say the word number. Found it in Daniel and it referred to years. I then searched history to find out what happened in the year 666. Nothing. I did find Islam was getting ready to attack Constantinople the capital of a Christian empire that would last a thousand years where they reigned with Christ. Not a bad start.
A Necessary Ingredient
to verify the fulfillment of prophecy. Your interpretation can prevent you from identifying the historical events that have been prophesied. Numbers do not require interpretation. All bible translations agree on numbers and colors. That is where you need to start.
A Cottage Industry
that goes beyond home bible studies. It uses private interpretation of ambiguous phases in prophecy to support a particular agenda. It ignores two thousand years of history simply because it doesn’t fit with preconceived interpretations. History is the only advantage we have over the early fathers of the Church so why not use it? How can we use prophecy to search history without first interpreting it? Numbers. Numbers and possibly colors don’t require interpretation. Start with numbers. Big numbers like a thousand.
Home 4
A Literal Interpretation
when different bibles use different words. Numbers and some colors are the only words you can rely on. Especially when it comes to prophecy. How can you be sure a historic event fulfills what has been prophesied? Numbers. Numbers that fit historical events. Almost all the bibles agree on numbers. No interpretation required. Use them.
A Study
of the Apocalypse. The results of this research have been presented on four different forums over the past 15 years. The latest and possibly the greatest presentation is at Theology Forums. Here using history I have specifically identified all the major parts of the Apocalypse. I don’t think you will find another presentation like this.
Home 3
A Date
for the Apocalypse. 30 September 395 and the author is John Chrysostom. All this according to Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov. For some reason R. H. Charles chose to include this in his book, “STUDIES IN THE APOCALYPSE”. There are more reasons to consider Chrysostom.
A Book
worthy of your time if you are really interested in what the Apocalypse is all about. “Studies in the Apocalypse” by R. H. Charles is based on his lectures delivered before the University of London. It is free, online, and searchable. If you read just one book on the Apocalypse, it should be this one.
Home 31
apocalypse 