A Significant Contribution –
A Church history: Constantine, Jerome, Eusebius, Chrysostom, and Augustine.
13
a few underrated people in history
a historian
A History of the Church –
A dog that didn’t bark. Eusebius never associates the churches with the Apocalypse. He does mention six of the seven churches but does not connect them with the Apocalypse. Since Victorinus has the same problem, it suggests that there may have been a version of the Apocalypse that didn’t have the seven churches.
Home 9
a witness
A Commentary on the Apocalypse –
A dog that didn’t bark. Victorinus didn’t mention the churches. He does mention the seven churches that Paul wrote to. So why not mention the seven churches that John wrote to? It is possible that his version of the Apocalypse didn’t have the seven churches. We need to look at Eusebius to see if he has the same problem.
Home 8
a commentary
A History –
A witness to what no longer exists. What was Victorinus looking at when he wrote his Commentary on the Apocalypse? What was Eusebius looking at when he wrote his Church History? We can only speculate based on what they wrote, what they didn’t write, and what is reasonable. Can we make sense of it? It makes more sense than most interpretations.
Home 7
a historian
A History of the Church –
A dog that didn’t bark. Eusebius never associates the churches with the Apocalypse. He does mention six of the seven churches but does not connect them with the Apocalypse. Since Victorinus has the same problem, it suggests that there may have been a version of the Apocalypse that didn’t have the seven churches.
Home 9
a witness
A Commentary on the Apocalypse –
A dog that didn’t bark. Victorinus didn’t mention the churches. He does mention the seven churches that Paul wrote to. So why not mention the seven churches that John wrote to? It is possible that his version of the Apocalypse didn’t have the seven churches. We need to look at Eusebius to see if he has the same problem.
Home 8
a commentary
A History –
A witness to what no longer exists. What was Victorinus looking at when he wrote his Commentary on the Apocalypse? What was Eusebius looking at when he wrote his Church History? We can only speculate based on what they wrote, what they didn’t write, and what is reasonable. Can we make sense of it? It makes more sense than most interpretations.
Home 7
a dog that didn’t bark
A Commentary Without The Churches –
A history that doesn’t connect the dots. Victorinus does not mention the seven churches. Eusebius does not associate the churches with the Apocalypse. They are looking at the original Apocalypse written by John the Baptist. It does not have the seven churches that were later added by John the Apostle. Really.
Home 25
a lamb
A Revelation –
A word mentioned 27 times in the Apocalypse. John knows the Lamb of God. Who else? John the Baptist. Who was preparing the way for the first coming? John the Baptist. Who failed to mention the seven churches? Victorinus. Who failed to associate them with the Apocalypse? Eusebius. Who doesn’t get it? Nearly everyone.
Home 23
a church history
A Historian Named Eusebius –
A martyr named Antipas not mentioned. He names six of the seven churches but never associates them with the Apocalypse. You don’t have to read or search his book. Just ask AI. Does Eusebius mention Antipas in his Church History? Antipas would not be in the first version of the Apocalypse written by John the Baptist. Does Eusebius mention any martyrs from Pergamum?
Home 9
apocalypse 