A Reliable Means
of interpreting the Apocalypse. Finding the same numbers and colors that fit historical events can confirm the fulfillment of prophecy. They must fit. Not just a few but many if not all. History alone can validate prophecy. The future cannot be trusted. We are not prophets.
A Little Book
that John ate and was told to prophesy again. These passages alone strongly suggest there were at least two versions of the Apocalypse. There are other reasons to believe this. You just have to look for them. It will improve your understanding as to why and when it was written along with who it was written by. Many didn’t think it belonged in the bible but somehow it made it.
Home 6
A Necessary Ingredient
to verify the fulfillment of prophecy. Your interpretation can prevent you from identifying the historical events that have been prophesied. Numbers do not require interpretation. All bible translations agree on numbers and colors. That is where you need to start.
A Cottage Industry
that goes beyond home bible studies. It uses private interpretation of ambiguous phases in prophecy to support a particular agenda. It ignores two thousand years of history simply because it doesn’t fit with preconceived interpretations. History is the only advantage we have over the early fathers of the Church so why not use it? How can we use prophecy to search history without first interpreting it? Numbers. Numbers and possibly colors don’t require interpretation. Start with numbers. Big numbers like a thousand.
Home 4
A Literal Interpretation
when different bibles use different words. Numbers and some colors are the only words you can rely on. Especially when it comes to prophecy. How can you be sure a historic event fulfills what has been prophesied? Numbers. Numbers that fit historical events. Almost all the bibles agree on numbers. No interpretation required. Use them.
A Study
of the Apocalypse. The results of this research have been presented on four different forums over the past 15 years. The latest and possibly the greatest presentation is at Theology Forums. Here using history I have specifically identified all the major parts of the Apocalypse. I don’t think you will find another presentation like this.
Home 3
A Prophecy
made two thousand years ago. This was not about the end times! It was about the first coming. His “time is at hand” was two thousand years ago. John the Baptist knew that and he was preparing the way for the “Lamb of God”. You will find the word “lamb” 27 times in the Apocalypse. This suggests John the Baptist wrote the first version.
A Fit
into the future which is very flexible. History not so much. You can try to rewrite history but there will always be a few honest historians that will resist your attempts. Only a prophet can predict the future. Only a historian can confirm the fulfillment of a prophecy. Only numbers can confirm what fits history. Use them all.
Home 7
A Prophecy
they are putting into the future 2000 years later. Why? History does not fit their interpretation. Maybe their interpretation is wrong. Maybe the prophecy is about the first coming and not the second one. This is a reasonable explanation. Putting that which must shortly come to pass into the future 2000 years later is not reasonable.
Home 6
A Necessary Ingredient
along with numbers can help us interpret the Apocalypse. Only history can confirm the fulfillment of prophecy. Only numbers can prevent us from misinterpreting prophecy. We can’t be sure what a ‘horn’ is but we can be sure there are ‘ten’ of them. We can also be sure that the “ten horns” of Daniel are the same “ten horns” of the Apocalypse. They have to fit history.
Home 5
