three johns 

A Fact 

that demands some kind of explanation.  Have you heard one?  Probably not.  A reasonable explanation is there were three different Johns connected with the Apocalypse.  John the Baptist, John the Apostle, and John Chrysostom.  It fits with history.  Really.  

Home 26

false prophets 

A Cottage Industry 

that is out of control.  Private interpretation of what is written too often is predicting the future because they do not know how to read the past.  Your interpretation belongs in the future only because it doesn’t fit in history.  Chances are you are not a prophet and need to limit yourself to history.  

Home

pure speculation 

A Warning 

that you can’t believe what you find on the internet.  Duh?  So what can you believe?  A reasonable explanation when there is no alternative to a situation that demands an answer.  What is a reasonable explanation?  Something that is consistent with historical events.  

Home 22

caution 

A Commentary 

by Victorinus modified by Jerome who was not happy with it.  What he added and/or edited is not clear.  It is possible that Victorinus was looking at a copy of the original Apocalypse and Jerome was not aware of this.  This would also explain why so many were convinced it was not written by John the Apostle who may have added the churches at a later date.  

Home

where do you go for 

A Reliable Copy 

of the Apocalypse.  We know that John Chrysostom was in Ephesus when Jerome was finishing the Vulgate.  Who in Ephesus could be trusted?  Certainly not the seven bishops Chrysostom was replacing.  Jerome knew all the major players and must have known Chrysostom was someone you could trust. 

Home 21